Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 18 additions & 2 deletions cite.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,11 @@ layout: page
title: Cite SasView
---

If you found this software useful to your work please cite and/or acknowledge its use in your publications.
If you found this software useful to your work please cite and/or [acknowledge](#acknowledging-sasview) its use in your publications.

Users who utilized the SasView GUI need only cite [SasView](#citing-sasview). Users who integrated packages
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wondering about the wording 'SasView GUI' and whether 'GUI-driven SasView' would be better?

into other software or scripts should cite every package used amongst [SasView](#citing-sasview),
[SasModels](#citing-sasmodels), and [SasData](#citing-sasdata).

### Citing SasView

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -44,8 +48,20 @@ In version 6+, look for the option _Cite SasView_. In version 5 or earlier, look
| 4.1.0 | M. Doucet et al. SasView Version 4.1.0, 10.5281/zenodo.438138 |
| 4.0.0 | M. Doucet et al. SasView Version 4.0.0, 10.5281/zenodo.159083 |

### Citing SasModels

For releases v1.0.12 and prior, please cite:

> P. Kienzle, et. al., SasModels (2016), https://github.com/SasView/sasmodels

Comment on lines +55 to +56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

using (2016) seems totally gratuitous (and actually wrong) given for example the version 1.0.12 was released in Dec of 2025! why not just include the version number as we do with the sasview GUI package ( P. Kienzel, et al., sasmodels Version 1.0.12, https://githbu.com/SasView/sasmodels)?

### Citing SasData

For releases v0.11.0 and prior, please cite:

> J. Krzywon, et. al. SasData (2022), https://github.com/SasView/sasdata

Comment on lines +61 to +62
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same comment as for sasmodels. 2022 is clearly incorrect. a version number however would be helpful I would think?

### Acknowledging SasView

If you would like to acknowledge SasView, please include the following:
If you would like to acknowledge the use of one or more sasview software packages, please include the following:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'sasview' should be 'SasView'.


> _This work benefited from the use of the SasView application, originally developed under NSF award DMR-0520547. SasView contains code developed with funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the SINE2020 project, grant agreement No 654000._