-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Citing SasModels and SasData #32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,7 +3,11 @@ layout: page | |
| title: Cite SasView | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| If you found this software useful to your work please cite and/or acknowledge its use in your publications. | ||
| If you found this software useful to your work please cite and/or [acknowledge](#acknowledging-sasview) its use in your publications. | ||
|
|
||
| Users who utilized the SasView GUI need only cite [SasView](#citing-sasview). Users who integrated packages | ||
| into other software or scripts should cite every package used amongst [SasView](#citing-sasview), | ||
| [SasModels](#citing-sasmodels), and [SasData](#citing-sasdata). | ||
|
|
||
| ### Citing SasView | ||
|
|
||
|
|
@@ -44,8 +48,20 @@ In version 6+, look for the option _Cite SasView_. In version 5 or earlier, look | |
| | 4.1.0 | M. Doucet et al. SasView Version 4.1.0, 10.5281/zenodo.438138 | | ||
| | 4.0.0 | M. Doucet et al. SasView Version 4.0.0, 10.5281/zenodo.159083 | | ||
|
|
||
| ### Citing SasModels | ||
|
|
||
| For releases v1.0.12 and prior, please cite: | ||
|
|
||
| > P. Kienzle, et. al., SasModels (2016), https://github.com/SasView/sasmodels | ||
|
|
||
|
Comment on lines
+55
to
+56
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. using (2016) seems totally gratuitous (and actually wrong) given for example the version 1.0.12 was released in Dec of 2025! why not just include the version number as we do with the sasview GUI package ( P. Kienzel, et al., sasmodels Version 1.0.12, https://githbu.com/SasView/sasmodels)? |
||
| ### Citing SasData | ||
|
|
||
| For releases v0.11.0 and prior, please cite: | ||
|
|
||
| > J. Krzywon, et. al. SasData (2022), https://github.com/SasView/sasdata | ||
|
|
||
|
Comment on lines
+61
to
+62
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. same comment as for sasmodels. 2022 is clearly incorrect. a version number however would be helpful I would think? |
||
| ### Acknowledging SasView | ||
|
|
||
| If you would like to acknowledge SasView, please include the following: | ||
| If you would like to acknowledge the use of one or more sasview software packages, please include the following: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 'sasview' should be 'SasView'. |
||
|
|
||
| > _This work benefited from the use of the SasView application, originally developed under NSF award DMR-0520547. SasView contains code developed with funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the SINE2020 project, grant agreement No 654000._ | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just wondering about the wording 'SasView GUI' and whether 'GUI-driven SasView' would be better?