Conversation
| > P. Kienzle, et. al., SasModels (2016), https://github.com/SasView/sasmodels | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
using (2016) seems totally gratuitous (and actually wrong) given for example the version 1.0.12 was released in Dec of 2025! why not just include the version number as we do with the sasview GUI package ( P. Kienzel, et al., sasmodels Version 1.0.12, https://githbu.com/SasView/sasmodels)?
| > J. Krzywon, et. al. SasData (2022), https://github.com/SasView/sasdata | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same comment as for sasmodels. 2022 is clearly incorrect. a version number however would be helpful I would think?
| Each release of SasView is given a unique DOI. As new versions are released, calculation methods may change or be corrected. | ||
| To account for these calculation differences, please cite the version or versions you used to analyze your data. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems like it should be part of the preamble not part of citing sasview specifically. calculation in sasmodels and sasdata can change with versions as well and is why it is important to know the version used. This is known to be important for sasmodels where there have been errors in models that have been corrected (e.g. the paracrystal models)
| If you found this software useful to your work please cite and/or acknowledge its use in your publications. | ||
| If you found this software useful to your work please cite and/or [acknowledge](#acknowledging-sasview) its use in your publications. | ||
|
|
||
| Users who utilized the SasView GUI need only cite [SasView](#citing-sasview). Users who integrated packages |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just wondering about the wording 'SasView GUI' and whether 'GUI-driven SasView' would be better?
| ### Acknowledging SasView | ||
|
|
||
| If you would like to acknowledge SasView, please include the following: | ||
| If you would like to acknowledge the use of one or more sasview software packages, please include the following: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
'sasview' should be 'SasView'.
4 participants
This updates our citation site with information on citing and/or acknowledging sasmodels and sasdata.