Verify TAG to LOG_TAG naming standard compliance#42
Closed
Conversation
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Rename all TAG constants to LOG_TAG
Verify TAG to LOG_TAG naming standard compliance
Mar 1, 2026
Member
|
No issue to fix indead. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Repository already complies with LOG_TAG naming standard. No TAG constants require renaming.
Findings
Existing Implementation:
GTFSDataBase.ktalready usesLOG_TAGprivate val LOG_TAG: String = GTFSDataBase::class.java.simpleNamegetLogTag()methods existSearch Scope:
Result
Standard already established and followed. No code changes required.
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.