Change offset commit behaviour to be in line with Java consumers#45
Change offset commit behaviour to be in line with Java consumers#45ducas wants to merge 2 commits intomicrosoft:masterfrom
Conversation
|
What would be the risk of making this the default behavior, since it seems that this is a more correct way of managing committed offsets? The expansion of various little config settings is starting to get a little crazy. |
|
i agree that a config setting for everything can get crazy. i would like to i can run a few tests to see if you get duplicate messages or not. the only On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 3:10 AM mhorstma notifications@github.com wrote:
|
|
Your point of keeping parity with the Java consumer config is a good one. I think this change looks good. |
|
@mhorstma how does this look now...? |
|
Looks great to me. Let's give others a little time to weigh in, if they wish, before merging. |
this brings the behavior of the balanced consumer in line with the java implementation
b87b743 to
9fc7b5c
Compare
|
i've rejigged and rebased this PR as #46 caused conflicts |
…ng an offset out of range error.
… versus previously consumed offset. Fixes #27