docs: blog post on Open Responses compliance and OpenAI compatibility#5232
Merged
franciscojavierarceo merged 21 commits intollamastack:mainfrom Mar 26, 2026
Conversation
…lity Adds a blog post covering Llama Stack's 100% Open Responses compliance, comprehensive OpenAI API feature support (Files, Vector Stores, Conversations, Prompts, Chat Completions, Responses, MCP, Connectors), and the value proposition for running AI infrastructure on your own terms. Co-Authored-By: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
meta-cla
bot
added
the
CLA Signed
cdoern
reviewed
Mar 20, 2026
Collaborator
cdoern
left a comment
cdoern
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just some initial comments!
|
|
||
| # Advanced responses with tool orchestration (e.g., with Fireworks) | ||
| response = client.responses.create( | ||
| model="meta-llama/Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct", |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit, but should we use a more modern model here like ollama/gpt-oss:20b?
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
oh also I think either way the provider id is wrong here and should be ollama/
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah we can use ollama/gpts-oss:20b
| ```python | ||
| # Standard chat completions (e.g., with Ollama) | ||
| completion = client.chat.completions.create( | ||
| model="ollama/llama3.2:3b", messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Explain RAG"}] |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
same here, maybe a different model?
Co-authored-by: Charlie Doern <charlie@doern.me>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Doern <charlie@doern.me>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Doern <charlie@doern.me>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Doern <charlie@doern.me>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Doern <charlie@doern.me>
Co-authored-by: Charlie Doern <charlie@doern.me>
gyliu513
reviewed
Mar 23, 2026
Combines feedback from cdoern (Ollama setup flow) and gyliu513 (uv-based install) into a single getting started section. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
franciscojavierarceo
requested review from
ashwinb,
bbrowning,
ehhuang,
leseb,
mattf and
raghotham
as code owners
Signed-off-by: Francisco Javier Arceo <farceo@redhat.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Context
Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code