add new sort order, and a way to go back to old order#1740
Open
nicholsk18 wants to merge 1 commit intojstanden:10.4.1from
Open
add new sort order, and a way to go back to old order#1740nicholsk18 wants to merge 1 commit intojstanden:10.4.1from
nicholsk18 wants to merge 1 commit intojstanden:10.4.1from
Conversation
Owner
|
Sure! This seems perfectly reasonable. I'll get it merged. 😀 |
jstanden
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2023
Contributor
Author
|
Hey @jstanden any update on when this will make it in to production? Thanks! |
|
I'm interested in this change as well! :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I thought this might be useful for others as well. Our team wants to see all message, but they like to see newest messages first. Radio buttons looked to be the easiest so I also added default option. I know I skipped the place where the messages actually get expended, but since 2 will also equal true figured it be fine. Let me know if I need to adjust anything