Conversation
My feeling would be to merge it all in, but will that then include some functions related to ratio estimation that are unfinished? |
|
apparently there is still some work to do as vignettes are outdated |
Yes true, my idea is that we remove the @export tag from the unfinshed stuff and add to its description that it is unfinished I think that not having an @export tag on stuff that is not finished also in dev is a good practice. |
Yes, that's a good way to deal with it. If a user is poking about and using un-exported functions then it is at their own risk. |
Merge branch 'dev' of https://github.com/ices-tools-dev/RDBEScore into dev # Conflicts: # RDBEScore.Rproj
…est data (not best solution). (#227)
…not best solution) (#227)
Merge branch 'dev' of https://github.com/ices-tools-dev/RDBEScore into dev # Conflicts: # vignettes/ratio-estimating-rdbesdataobjects.Rmd
Merge branch 'dev' of github.com:ices-tools-dev/RDBEScore into dev # Conflicts: # R/listPackageFunctions.R # man/getRdTitle.Rd # man/listPackageFunctions.Rd
|
@rix133 are you happy to merge this in? It looks ok to me. I can see 2 of the checks are failing. The test-coverage check errors looks like its a problem with the Github action ("Missing download info for actions/upload-artifact@v3"). The tests pass on my laptop. The mac-os-latest check is failing with "ERROR: compilation failed for package ‘data.table’" - since we're not on CRAN yet can we live with that? |
|
I think it is OK |
I guess there will be no more updates and while as the dev works and we have all import functions implemented i think pulling the whole dev into main. Or if you think we should only pull those parts that are essential we shoud pick some commits to merge with main into a new branch?