Skip to content

Update the "iteration task" issue template to "sprint task" #769

Open
jacobsimionato wants to merge 13 commits intoflutter:mainfrom
jacobsimionato:template
Open

Update the "iteration task" issue template to "sprint task" #769
jacobsimionato wants to merge 13 commits intoflutter:mainfrom
jacobsimionato:template

Conversation

@jacobsimionato
Copy link
Collaborator

@jacobsimionato jacobsimionato commented Feb 25, 2026

This should make it easier to create tasks in the sprint.

  • Add "sprint ready" tag, to automate adding to the project.
  • Add default P2 priority to skip triage

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the issue template for sprint tasks, renaming the file and modifying the template's content. My review includes one suggestion to improve the clarity of the template's description to better align with the project's contribution guidelines for clear documentation.

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
---
name: Sprint Task
about: An issue used sprint planning
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The about description is somewhat vague. Per the repository's contributing guidelines (docs/contributing/README.md), documentation should be clear and concise. The current description, "An issue used sprint planning", doesn't clearly describe the purpose of the issue itself, which can be confusing for users selecting a template. A more descriptive text would be more helpful.

Suggested change
about: An issue used sprint planning
about: A concrete implementation task to be completed during the current sprint.
References
  1. The repository's contributing guidelines state that all documentation (including .md files like issue templates) should be clear, consistent, and concise. The current 'about' text could be clearer. (link)

@polina-c
Copy link
Collaborator

Do we want to add label 'front-line-treaged' instead of P2?

Normally current sprint is P1, so i would just skip priority

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants