Skip to content

test: refactor tests to return Result#196

Merged
k9withabone merged 1 commit intomainfrom
test-refactor-result
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

test: refactor tests to return Result#196
k9withabone merged 1 commit intomainfrom
test-refactor-result

Conversation

@k9withabone
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Allows for using ? instead of unwrapping.

This just cleans up the older test code and makes it more idiomatic.

@k9withabone k9withabone added this to the v0.3.2 milestone Mar 7, 2026
@k9withabone k9withabone requested a review from TheRealBecks March 7, 2026 19:27
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@TheRealBecks TheRealBecks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Allows for using `?` instead of unwrapping.

This just cleans up the older test code and makes it more idiomatic.

Signed-off-by: Paul Nettleton <k9@k9withabone.dev>
@k9withabone k9withabone force-pushed the test-refactor-result branch from 181a44c to 99f06ea Compare March 9, 2026 18:28
@k9withabone k9withabone merged commit 698d2ec into main Mar 9, 2026
15 checks passed
@k9withabone k9withabone deleted the test-refactor-result branch March 9, 2026 18:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants