Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1550edc40d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| .optional(zOpenAIReasoningEffort) | ||
| .describe( | ||
| "Optional reasoning effort for this edit. Use `low` for normal edits, `medium` for multi-section rewrites, and `high` for the most complex asks. Defaults to `low` if omitted.", | ||
| "Optional reasoning effort for this edit. Use `minimal` for normal edits, `low` for multi-section rewrites, and `medium` for complex tasks, or `high` for the most creative asks. Defaults to `minimal` if omitted.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The schema description now says omitted reasoningEffort defaults to minimal, but the write tool still sends toolCall.input.reasoningEffort ?? "low" in useWriteTool (apps/web/src/ai/tools/write/client.ts), so callers that rely on the schema contract will actually run at a higher effort than documented. This mismatch was introduced in this commit and can skew latency/cost and tool-selection behavior from the model.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.