Conversation
💡 What: Refactored `_extract_calls` and `_compute_complexity` in `src/scanner/ast_parser.py` to use `ast.NodeVisitor` instead of multiple nested `ast.walk` loops. 🎯 Why: `ast.walk` yields all nodes in a tree, leading to an O(N^2) evaluation time when nested within another full traversal. This creates massive inefficiencies for large ASTs. 📊 Measured Improvement: Benchmarked a large AST (100 parent functions, 5,000 nested functions, 105,000 total calls). Extraction time was reduced from ~13 seconds to ~6.7 seconds.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
ishaanxgupta
changed the title
|
LGTM |
1 participant
💡 What: Refactored
_extract_callsand_compute_complexityinsrc/scanner/ast_parser.pyto useast.NodeVisitorinstead of multiple nestedast.walkloops.🎯 Why:
ast.walkyields all nodes in a tree, leading to an O(N^2) evaluation time when nested within another full traversal. This creates massive inefficiencies for large ASTs.📊 Measured Improvement: Benchmarked a large AST (100 parent functions, 5,000 nested functions, 105,000 total calls). Extraction time was reduced from ~13 seconds to ~6.7 seconds.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 1120684622716052586 started by @ishaanxgupta