Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Concurrent Execution of Tool Calls in Retrieval Pipeline#72

Draft
ishaanxgupta wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/concurrent-retrieval-tools-16227242812413447085
Draft

⚡ Bolt: Concurrent Execution of Tool Calls in Retrieval Pipeline#72
ishaanxgupta wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
bolt/concurrent-retrieval-tools-16227242812413447085

Conversation

@ishaanxgupta
Copy link
Member

💡 What: Replaced the sequential for loop executing tools (_execute_tool) with an asyncio.gather call mapped over an inner _process_tool_call(tc) async method in src/pipelines/retrieval.py's run method.
🎯 Why: To drastically reduce latency bottlenecks. Sequential execution meant overall wait time scaled linearly with the number of tools requested. Running them concurrently bounds time spent to the longest single tool request.
📊 Measured Improvement: Baseline measurements taking ~1.5s for 3 tasks with simulated 0.5s delays dropped to ~0.5s, confirming a ~3x performance improvement for 3 concurrent tool calls.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16227242812413447085 started by @ishaanxgupta

@google-labs-jules
Copy link

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant