fix(cluster-header-logs): add additional information

[RemiBonnet]

Summary

https://qovery.slack.com/archives/C0AML0VDUV8/p1774518915288869

• Add additional information to the cluster logs view (threads here and here)
• Remove the ‎onClick handler from rows in the environment deployment list to be able to copy-paste the ‎execution_id, and to be consistent with the service deployment list.

Screenshots / Recordings

Testing

• Changes tested locally in the relevant Console's pages and Storybooks
• yarn test or yarn test -u (if you need to regenerate snapshots)
• yarn format
• yarn lint

PR Checklist

• I followed naming, styling, and TypeScript rules (see .cursor/rules)
• I performed a self-review (diff inspected, dead code removed)
• I titled the PR using Conventional Commits with a scope when possible (e.g. feat(service): add new Terraform service) - required for semantic-release
• I only kept necessary comments, written in English (watch for useless AI comments)
• I involved a designer to validate UI changes if I am not a designer
• I covered new business logic with tests (unit)
• I confirmed CI is green (Codecov red can be accepted)
• I reviewed and executed locally any AI-assisted code

[RemiBonnet]

Qovery can create a Preview Environment for this PR.
To trigger its creation, please post a comment with one of the following command.

Command	Blueprint environment
/qovery preview 15d69f24-9bc1-4a8d-80fe-d1bb1b2bcd00	New Navigation
/qovery preview {all|UUID1,UUID2,...}	To preview multiple environments

---

This comment has been generated from Qovery AI 🤖.
Below, a word from its wisdom :

The backlog never ends, be at peace with it

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (new-navigation@d33d798). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...r-logs/cluster-header-logs/cluster-header-logs.tsx	75.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             new-navigation    #2550   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage                  ?   45.47%           
=================================================
  Files                     ?      696           
  Lines                     ?    16149           
  Branches                  ?     4801           
=================================================
  Hits                      ?     7344           
  Misses                    ?     7465           
  Partials                  ?     1340           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	45.47% <75.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[TheoGrandin74]

Suggested change

	<Icon iconName="code" iconStyle="regular" className="text-base text-neutral-subtle" />
	<Icon iconName="code" iconStyle="regular" className="text-sm text-neutral-subtle" />

[TheoGrandin74]

Tbh I'm even wondering if we should not just have the execution id in the same small "tag" as the cluster version, could be even more clean