Fix issues with Blender 2.8+ boolean modifiers#78
Open
willcliffy wants to merge 1 commit intoProbableTrain:masterfrom
Open
Fix issues with Blender 2.8+ boolean modifiers#78willcliffy wants to merge 1 commit intoProbableTrain:masterfrom
willcliffy wants to merge 1 commit intoProbableTrain:masterfrom
Conversation
…n depth in model_generator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using an extrusion depth of 0 with Three.js results in the normals of exported objects being flipped inside-out. By supplying an extrusion depth > 0, the standard Blender boolean modifiers should work as expected.
For the current version of the exporter, you can still use Blender 2.8+ if you first flip the normals of meshes that have a depth of 0. I tested with Blender 3.4.