Convert monin_obukhov.tech.ps to LaTeX document

[underwoo]

Description
Conversion of Monon Obukhov PostScript tech document to LaTeX.

No issue yet.

How Has This Been Tested?
Only documentation, no real need to test ATT.

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• My changes generate no new warnings
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
• New check tests, if applicable, are included
• make distcheck passes

[underwoo]

PDF version of original PostScript, to help with review of LaTeX version.

To create a PDF from the LaTeX version, clone the repository and enter the monin_obukhov directory and run pdflatex monin_obukhov_tech.tex. Note, must have pdflatex installed. This does work on the GFDL workstations.

monin_obukhov.tech.pdf

[mlee03]

I only found these for the equations:

Equation 1, subscript for u should be *
Equation 20, the denominator should not be squared
Equation 39, greater than equal signs looks better with \geq from \usepackage{amssymb}
Equation 45, ) should not be a subscript
Paragraph before Equation 24, z is missing in $_h$
"If there were only two inputs – i.e., if one could assume that the ration of $z_0$ to $_h$"

Paragraph before Equation 34, z_z --> z_0
One finds, with considerable effort... $F(\zeta;\zeta_0) = F(\zeta) - F(\zeta_0)$ where $\zeta_0 = z_0/L = \zeta z_z/z$)

[wrongkindofdoctor]

should be (except where there is sea spray, etc...)

[underwoo]

I only found these for the equations:

Equation 1, subscript for u should be *
Equation 20, the denominator should not be squared
Equation 39, greater than equal signs looks better with \geq from \usepackage{amssymb}
Equation 45, ) should not be a subscript
Paragraph before Equation 24, z is missing in $_h$
"If there were only two inputs – i.e., if one could assume that the ration of $z_0$ to $_h$"

Paragraph before Equation 34, z_z --> z_0
One finds, with considerable effort... $F(\zeta;\zeta_0) = F(\zeta) - F(\zeta_0)$ where $\zeta_0 = z_0/L = \zeta z_z/z$)

Thank you. I have corrected these.

[wrongkindofdoctor]

I'll note that there's a blank page at the end of the pdf, but it's not clear why. This might be a byproduct of the latex version or float settings.