Fix module build on CentOS 9 and 10#561
Open
richgieg wants to merge 1 commit intoDisplayLink:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Contributor
|
FYI @elguero, please approve. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The evdi module build fails on CentOS Stream 9 and 10 due to some 6.17 kernel changes being backported. This PR adds a CENTOSFLAG to differentiate from ELFLAG because CentOS Stream runs ahead of the other EL kernels (Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, RHEL) and they don't have the same changes backported yet.
I suppose when the time comes to add the defined(EL9) and defined(EL10) checks for the 6.17 changes to evdi_drm_drv.h and evdi_fb.c, then the defined(CENTOS9) and defined(CENTOS10) checks can be removed because CentOS Stream 9 and 10 also trigger the EL9 and EL10 flags, respectively. But it wouldn't hurt to leave them either.