███████╗ ██████╗  ██████╗ ██╗███████╗████████╗
██╔════╝██╔════╝ ██╔═══██╗██║██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝
█████╗  ██║  ███╗██║   ██║██║███████╗   ██║   
██╔══╝  ██║   ██║██║   ██║██║╚════██║   ██║   
███████╗╚██████╔╝╚██████╔╝██║███████║   ██║   
╚══════╝ ╚═════╝  ╚═════╝ ╚═╝╚══════╝   ╚═╝   

SYSTEMS > SENTENCES
OUTPUT > OPINION
EXECUTION > EXCUSES

Engineering with intent. Systems over noise. Execution over talk.

• Senior-level engineer by output, not by title
• Systems thinker. Constraint enforcer. Failure-mode hunter
• Obsessed with performance, clarity, determinism
• Allergic to:
  • buzzwords
  • cargo-cult frameworks
  • fake "impact"

If it can't be measured, it doesn't exist.

Note: Replace YOUR_WAKATIME with your Wakatime username to enable time tracking stats.

Note: Replace YOUR_LEETCODE and YOUR_CODEFORCES with your usernames to enable competitive programming stats.

1. Correctness is binary
If it sometimes works, it doesn't work.

2. Abstractions pay rent
If it reduces clarity or performance → delete it.

3. Benchmarks > beliefs
Every performance claim without numbers is fiction.

4. Defaults are hostile
Assume frameworks lie until proven otherwise.

5. Readability is a scaling strategy
Unreadable code is future downtime.

6. Refactors are not optional
Entropy is real. Fight it or drown.

7. Automation over trust
Humans forget. Pipelines don't.

8. Failure modes are requirements
If you can't name how it breaks, you don't understand it.

9. Tests are documentation
If tests don't exist, the behavior is undefined.

10. Performance is a feature
Slow code is broken code.

• Readability beats cleverness
• APIs are contracts, not suggestions
• Every abstraction pays rent
• Defaults are usually wrong
• Speed without correctness is failure
• Complexity must be justified with benchmarks
• Documentation is code that doesn't compile

• High-performance Android architecture
• Compose Multiplatform at scale
• Build systems & CI hardening
• Prompt engineering & agent workflows
• Removing human error via automation
• Systems that fail gracefully

❌ Tutorials without production relevance
❌ Magic libraries with no benchmarks
❌ "Trust me bro" engineering
❌ Passive code reviews
❌ Fragile systems
❌ Code without failure modes documented ❌ Performance claims without numbers

Broken systems taught more than successful demos ever did.

graph TD
A[Traffic Spike] --> B[Cache Saturation]
B --> C[OOM]
C --> D[Process Kill]
D --> E[Cold Restart]
E --> F[Latency Spike]
F --> G[User Impact]
G --> H[Circuit Breaker]
H --> I[Graceful Degradation]

Every system here ships with a death certificate in advance.

Every serious repo must contain this section.

What exact pain exists. No narrative.

• Latency:
• Memory:
• Scale:
• Platform:

Why this. Why not alternatives.

What is worse by design. Intentionally.

• What breaks first
• Under what load
• How it degrades

Exact conditions under which this system must be rewritten.

Enforcement Rule: No performance claims without benchmarks. CI enforces this.

If it isn't threat-modeled, it isn't secure.

• Attacker: external
• Data at risk: tokens, PII
• Surface: API, local storage, logs

• TLS enforced
• Secrets rotated
• Input validation mandatory
• No plaintext storage

• Nation-state defense
• Zero-day immunity

Responsible disclosure only.
Unverified reports ignored.

A repo is NOT MERGEABLE if:

• ❌ No README with architecture
• ❌ No benchmarks for perf claims
• ❌ No tests for core logic
• ❌ No failure modes documented
• ❌ No CI enforcement
• ❌ No code review approval
• ❌ No security scan passed

Gate Status:

• ✅ Architecture documented
• ✅ Benchmarks present
• ✅ Tests mandatory
• ✅ Failure modes defined
• ✅ CI enforced
• ✅ Security scanned

If it passes → ship
If it fails → rewrite or delete

Comfort is technical debt.
Simplicity is earned, not declared.
Systems don't fail — assumptions do.
Code without tests is legacy code.
Performance is a feature, not an afterthought.

Learn freely. Clone nothing.

See LICENSE-EXTENSION.md for anti-copypaste clause.

This profile is a signal weapon. Use it wisely.

Rule (Explicit):

🔴🔴🔴 = rewrite scheduled
🔴🔴 = refactor pending
🟡 = tolerable
🟢 = clean

This prevents bullshit excuses.

This repository assumes every PR is wrong until proven otherwise.

Psychological effect: Contributors slow down. Quality goes up.

See PR Template for review criteria.

See LICENSE-EXTENSION.md for anti-copypaste clause.

This profile is a signal weapon. Use it wisely.

✅ Engineering Excellence - Not just code, but systems thinking
✅ Zero Tolerance - For mediocrity, excuses, and hand-waving
✅ Measured Impact - Every claim backed by data
✅ Failure Literacy - Learning from mistakes, not hiding them
✅ Automation First - CI/CD, testing, quality gates enforced
✅ Security Minded - Threat modeling, not checklist compliance
✅ Production Ready - Benchmarks, monitoring, observability

❌ Junior Engineers - Can't handle the standards
❌ Buzzword Users - No substance behind claims
❌ Copy-Paste Artists - Anti-copypaste clause active
❌ Hand-Wavers - Performance claims need numbers
❌ Excuse Makers - Tech debt heatmap exposes reality

Last Updated: Auto-updated via GitHub Actions
Workflow Status: ✅ All workflows operational
Profile Grade: A (Weaponized Edition)