Hi,
I wasn't able to produce the report during the WK an dgive my feedback, but I have been able to run it now :-)
First of all, I think that the report is super useful. Thank you very much. It will be of great help.
Secondly, I have a couple of small comments/suggestions for your consideration:
-
The last table "Overview of CL data without CE" is showing all the registers. I find it more useful the tables above that show only a customizable number of lines.
-
Eurostat comparison is not so useful for countries with fisheries in other regions. Would it be possible to plot only eurostat fisheries for the areas covered in the report (NAtl and NSEA). It is probably not so easy, just in case.
-
for Spanish data, the value of the group OTH (other species) is influencing too much the graph "value summary for tom 20 species". If this happen for other countries, maybe the group OTH can be removed?

Thank you very much
Hi,
I wasn't able to produce the report during the WK an dgive my feedback, but I have been able to run it now :-)
First of all, I think that the report is super useful. Thank you very much. It will be of great help.
Secondly, I have a couple of small comments/suggestions for your consideration:
The last table "Overview of CL data without CE" is showing all the registers. I find it more useful the tables above that show only a customizable number of lines.
Eurostat comparison is not so useful for countries with fisheries in other regions. Would it be possible to plot only eurostat fisheries for the areas covered in the report (NAtl and NSEA). It is probably not so easy, just in case.
for Spanish data, the value of the group OTH (other species) is influencing too much the graph "value summary for tom 20 species". If this happen for other countries, maybe the group OTH can be removed?

Thank you very much